Minnesota Mom gets $1.5 Million dollar fine for downloading 25 songs

"Cyber Criminal"

Well the “wonderful people” at the RIAA and Capitol Records are back at it.

If you remember Jammie Thomas-Rasset from a few years ago, she has been fighting against the RIAA and Capitol Records for some time now. This time the Jury in her third trial has ruled she should pay $1.5 Million to Capitol Records. That’s a whopping $62.500 per song. Seems a little much considering the songs in question would have cost her about 25 bucks on iTunes. Unfortunately, she has become the poster child for the RIAA battle against illegal downloaders.

Her first trial she was ordered to pay $222,000 for copyright violations on more than 1,500 songs, (including songs from corporate sell outs; Green Day). Richard Marx, one of the artists who’s music she downloaded, said “I am ashamed to be associated with the Farcical prosecution of an illegal downloader”. Mrs. Thomas-Rasset has maintained throughout the many lawsuits that she was not the user who downloaded the music and that someone else in her household had used the computer. Her trial in 2009, ended with a much harsher result. $1.92 Million. Thankfully, A U.S. District court judge ruled that the $1.92 Million penalty was “Monstrous and shocking” and a “gross injustice”, and lowered it to $54,000.

The Recording Industry Association of America or RIAA which represents the major record labels was pleased with this current state of the case, even though they claim they have no intention to collect the $1.5 Million. “Now with three jury decisions behind us along with a clear affirmation of Ms. Thomas-Rasset’s willful liability, it is our hope that she finally accepts responsibility for her actions,” the RIAA said in a statement. Earlier this year, the RIAA offered her the opportunity to settle for $25,000 and an admission of guilt; which Thomas-Rasset declined.

Ok, What the hell are you people thinking. Really? $1.5 Million? Are you smoking crack? That is definitely the way to keep your fans happy. I really want to know who was the “PR Genius” who said “Hey I know, Lets bury a frigging soccer mom in debt. Then our fans won’t download anymore…Then…Profit?”. Your absolutely correct, your fans won’t download anymore. Personally, I wouldn’t buy anything from those artists ever again. I mean come on, this woman is not the person who is copying crap from CD’s she buys and putting it on the web, then returning the CD. Those are the people you should be going after, not this woman.

In closing just so we are clear. RIAA, Capitol Records and the judges who allowed this to happen, you guys are assholes.

-Zach “The Uber Geek” Morton

So you wanna become an SEO Rockstar?

So a friend sent me an article today that was pretty interesting. It was titled “How to become an SEO Ubergeek”. An Ubergeek? Oh no they didn’t.

The funny thing about the article was how indepth it was about how the search engines mine data, and less about how people search. No doubt, Latent semantic indexing and machine learning are things you should look into. However, isn’t it more important to know how PEOPLE search? After all, the secret to SEO is to understand what Google and the other search engines want. They want that when users came to their site and searched for something, that the first thing they clicked on was what they wanted. Isn’t that how they keep people coming back? If you went to Google and were searching for “Rubber Dog Toys”, and when Google displayed the results the first thing was a recipe for chicken kiev, would you keep coming back? I think not. Well if you don’t search there, then how is Google going to make their money (Ad words/ PPC)? So Google, Yahoo (dare I say Ya who?), and Bing all want to tighten further and further their algorithm of things they look for to rank your site.

Now heres the fun part. You and 8,000 of your competitors are going for keywords. That being said, we know that some people just want to “Game” the system. This means that the search engines are going to keep changing things to eliminate ways you can spam or game them. The first areas that they have tightened have been on-page optimization. Meta data, and lots of areas have been so abused that their weight has dropped. There are some sites that will put in hundreds of keywords into the meta keywords, and now it means almost nothing. I know right now some of you are saying but “Hey, you’ve said we need changes to our sites for that”. Thats correct. I said it means almost nothing. While its not heavily weighted, it still carries some weight. I look at it as another opportunity to advertise to Google the keywords I want to target, but don’t over do it.

Now, get ready for some super secret stuff. In on-page optimization, the number one thing you should look at is your content. What are you telling Google? Are you using the keywords inside the article (Don’t use too much or you’ll get “Dinged” for spamming)? Are you adding fresh content constantly?Most sites can improve their rank by simply adding a blog… and blogging. Thats a funny thing to me I know so many companies who are feverishly trying to get to page one, yet they won’t spend the time to actually blog about their business or news related to their industry.

The biggest factor in SEO is authority. Some people call this “link building” or linking, etc.

Having sites that point back to your site with a high level of authority to pass back to you is number one. You can build links in many ways, just make sure you don’t do too many too fast, or on unrelated sites. A lot of people buy links and then say “Hey, I bought all these links. Why isn’t my site on page one?!?!?”. Let’s analyze this, you bought a bunch of links for your Air Conditioning repair services and the links showed up on a site about hair care. Duh. Of course your site isn’t going to be on page one because of that. The purpose of link building is to get links from people, sites and pages RELEVANT to the keywords/ Subject your targeting.

One of my other favorite issues I have seen has been over optimization. A friend of mine had a BIG Client who’s customer kept taking and building links at the same time they were. What a mess, the site wouldn’t move and infact DROPPED in SERP rank because it looked like spamming to the search engines. This was of course after explaining to them that they should not be attempting link building on the same sites they were, and shouldn’t be link building at all for those sites. If your going to try a new method of doing anything, you shouldn’t do things to hinder that or do multiple new methods at a time other wise how will you know if something worked.

So, will reading this article (or any article for that matter) make you an SEO Rockstar? No. What will make you an SEO Rockstar is good fresh content, making sure your site looks appealing to Google and the other search engines, and testing things for yourself. There is no magic pill. There is not just one thing you can do right and get 1st page results. However, there is many things you can do right and get 1st page results.

-Zach “The Uber Geek” Morton

P.S. Before people say “Hey, he only made fun of yahoo!”. Anyone out there know what Bing stands for? But It’s Not Google.

Kudos Heather.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Browser Wars: Opera Vs. Chrome Vs… Mr. Potato Head?

Get your Game Face/ “Angry Eyes” on cause the browser wars are back in full swing. This time its Opera Vs. Chrome Vs. Mr. Potato Head. So it all started when Google released a little video demonstrating the speed of Chrome.

In the days following that little video Opera responded with this:

I think it’s pretty funny, but very telling. Google’s browser is hands down far superior to Opera in my opinion.
The funniest part of these videos to me is that here once again Google makes something Uber-Cool, and Opera can’t seem to catch up. I think this was Video Fail on Opera’s part because they really showed you the “Quality” you can expect with their browser. The main issue I have with both of these videos is the potato abuse. Mr. Potato Head Pwns you, FTW!

-Zach “The Uber Geek” Morton

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]